[e-privacy] [RFID] A Bit of Privacy
Marco A. Calamari
marcoc1 at dada.it
Fri May 6 15:53:52 CEST 2005
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 14:48 +0200, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
> http://www.rfidjournal.com/article/articleview/1536/1/128/
>
>
> A Bit of Privacy
> Instead of killing RFID tags to protect consumer privacy, we could add
> a privacy bit.
Questi sono scemi!
Se fanno cosi', ci sara' sicuramente una backdoor obbligatoria
per legge.
Mi somiglia all'RFC che proponeva l'"evil bit" per l'header
dei pacchetti TCP.
Si trattava di un bit che chi faceva attacchi informatici
avrebbe dovuto porre ad 1 per semplificare il lavoro
dei firewall.
Ovviamente la data era l'1 aprile.
Ma questi, ahime', mi sembra parlino sul serio.....
>
>
> May 2, 2005 - RFID privacy inflames passions as few other
> technological issues can. Readers of this journal are familiar with
> the enormous swirl of media attention around the topic. A statistic
> compiled by Ravi Pappu of ThingMagic summarizes the situation nicely:
> Of the Web pages returned by a Google search on the term "RFID" in
> late 2003, some 42 percent also contained the word "privacy." If
> item-level RFID tagging comes to pass, there is no gainsaying the
> privacy concerns it will bring. There is a real possibility of
> constellations of small wireless devices promiscuously emitting
> personal information. Some of the backlash against RFID, however, has
> assumed a form that is purely dramatic. Terms like "spy-chips," for
> example, neatly encapsulate the anxieties of a certain class of RFID
> opponent. But they distort any meaningful discussion of the uses of
> RFID, deny its benefits and cast privacy as a black-and-white issue.
>
> [...]
>
> Killing tags would kill many visions of RFID benefit for consumers. If
> consumers possess only dead RFID tags, then smart appliances such as
> RFID-enhanced refrigerators, ovens and washing machines will be
> unrealizable. Likewise, RFID systems to aid the elderly with
> medication compliance and navigation of their environments will be
> more difficult to deploy. The killing of tags would preclude many
> other possibilities for consumers, like item returns in retail shops
> without receipts (not to mention the concomitant benefits to industry,
> like refined quality-control information), retrieval of lost items,
> automated product-part searches and so forth.
>
> [...]
>
> To construct a broad RFID infrastructure safely, a balance needs to be
> struck between privacy and utility. The benefits of tags must be
> readily available, but so too should the means for restricting their
> emission of information. The aim of this article is to describe the
> privacy bit, a simple technological tool that helps achieve such a
> balance. The privacy bit may be viewed as a natural extension of an
> existing technology known as electronic article surveillance, or
> EAS. EAS can serve as a conceptual and technical bridge for the
> privacy bit.
>
> +++
>
> Ciao,
>
> --
> Andrea Glorioso sama at miu-ft.org +39 333 820 5723
> .:: Media Innovation Unit - Firenze Tecnologia ::.
> Conquering the world for fun and profit
> _______________________________________________
> e-privacy mailing list
> e-privacy at firenze.linux.it
> http://lists.firenze.linux.it/mailman/listinfo/e-privacy
--
+--------------- http://www.winstonsmith.info ---------------+
| il Progetto Winston Smith: scolleghiamo il Grande Fratello |
| the Winston Smith Project: unplug the Big Brother |
| Marco A. Calamari marcoc at dada.it http:// www.marcoc.it |
| DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B |
+ PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 ----------+
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.winstonsmith.org/pipermail/e-privacy/attachments/20050506/46594b11/attachment.pgp>
More information about the E-privacy
mailing list