[e-privacy] [CFP] Call for papers: Ethical Challenges of Ubiquitous Computing
Andrea Glorioso
andrea at digitalpolicy.it
Thu May 3 09:55:15 CEST 2007
Cari tutti,
giro - con preghiera di diffusione ove riteniate opportuno - una "call
for papers" (scadenza "extendend abstract": 15 giugno) che penso possa
essere potenzialmente interessante per chi legge.
Per ulteriori informazioni non rivolgetevi a me, ma a David Phillips
<davidj.phillips at utoronto.ca> e/o Klaus Wiegerling
<wiegerlingklaus at aol.com>.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Call for Papers
Ethical Challenges of Ubiquitous Computing
Call for Papers for Vol. 8 (12/2007)
- Deadline for abstracts: June 15, 2007
- Notification of acceptance to authors: August 15, 2007
- Deadline for full articles: November 15, 2007
- Publication: December, 2007
Introduction
With the idea of Ubiquitous Computing introduced by Mark Weiser (often
bracketed with slight modifications under the concepts of Pervasive
Computing or Ambient Intelligence), the idea of an ICT saturation of
the entire mesosphere Ð i.e. those old cyberspace fantasies of an
angel-like existence, as they were still termed in the 1980s Ð appears
to be on the point of becoming an earthly reality. In a certain sense,
our everyday world should be made intelligent, and all our actions, at
all times and everywhere, should undergo some kind of ICT
support. Thus, the idea of ubiquitous Computing means an omnipresent
ICT accompaniment of our daily life, either as an active user, as a
passive beneficiary, as a monitored and possibly even as a system
guided being. These systems could be available via memory (storage and
accessing capacity), they usually have a perception (sensor
technology) and a certain capacity for interpreting situations
(context awareness). A whole host of technical research fields are
working toward the goal of Ubiquitous Computing, from mechatronics to
materials science, from telecommunication engineering to computing and
AI research. The idea though of the omnipresence of these systems is
necessarily misleading, because there will of course only be pockets
where they come into effect, and we may generally doubt the total
pervasiveness of our world on account of both technical and economic
reasons. The maintenance alone of the infrastructure, particularly
sensor technology, will doubtlessly entail such enormous costs that it
will not be a case of an area-wide saturation. In any event, the
present scenarios involve fields of application which will more or
less have an impact on every domain of life, from areas of personal
interest such as leisure activities or health care, to possible
sources of income in the economy, and even to questions of public
interest, such as domestic and foreign security.
Any ethical discussion of Ubiquitous Computing is inherently
problematic because we are dealing with emergent technology. We have
to take into account its potential, irrespective of how far this
potential can be realised in detail, and irrespective of the fields in
which all-pervasive ICT accompaniment will find
acceptance. Nevertheless, there is no question that any technology
that is going to so radically encroach on our daily life is in need of
some kind of ethical framework, not least to provide direction to
frequently financially motivated research, with respect to existing
traditional values and sought after option values.
The case of Ubiquitous Computing brings into sharper focus two key
problems in theoretical ethics that have already attained a special
position in applied media ethics: On the one hand, the determination
of reality which we should influence with our acting, and on the other
hand, the determination of the subject to which these actions should
be attributed and should intervene in reality. In certain sense we may
say that reality diminishes with respect to its confrontational
character, and hence becomes virtual, and there comes into focus the
subject that is perceived by intelligent systems, always as a user
stereotype, i.e. as a buying, sickly and travelling subject etc. To a
certain extent the subject becomes weakened, and, moreover, the
formation of its identity is impaired. This is because it has to above
all manufacture its personality without the recognition and
non-recognition of a present Other, and possibly without the
development of those specific skills dependent on this confrontational
experience with the world. For our everyday organisational abilities
end up becoming reduced by intelligent systems. And they perhaps
direct our behaviour, without it coming to explicit social processes
characterised by negotiating and recognitional procedures.
The experience of the world and the self will therefore undergo a
transformation in intelligent environments. This gives rise to
countless ethical issues whose analysis must go hand in hand with the
development of such systems. Thus, the above key questions have to be
supplemented by additional specific problems, concerning, for
instance, the anonymous generation of cognition, possible changes in
the ethos of cognition, privacy and the formation of trust in
intelligent worlds, and finally, the context sensitivity of the system
and the related intrusion in our sphere of understanding.
The 8th issue of IRIE will tackle the ethical challenge of ubiquitous
systems and therefore furnish a contribution to the establishment of
an ethics of Ubiquitous Computing. This ethics is anchored in the
field of media ethics, yet it radicalises to a certain degree the
fundamental issues in this field, insofar as the entire mesosphere
appears as a sphere disposed to such media. And hence, the boundaries
then disappear between electronic technology and what underpins it.
Possible Topics and Questions
The production of reality (as concrete contents) and the production of
Wirklichkeit (as opposed to the individual and an embedding of
reality)
? Medialization of the physical world
? Interpretation of reality and environments using context sensitive and adaptive systems
? Modelling of acting and behaviour through context sensitive and adaptive systems
Privacy, Surveillance, Trust
? Privacy in intelligent interactive environments
? Surveillance, data protection and personal freedom
? Ubiquitous systems and trust
Manufacturing of the Acting Subject
? Identity formation in intelligent environments
? The Other in intelligent environments
? Self-perception in intelligent environments
Cognition in intelligent environments
? Generating cognition in intelligent environments
? Anonymous generation of cognition and cognitive acquisition
? Transformation of the cognitive ethos
Problems of Ubiquitous Computing in special fields of application
? Health Care
? Economy and work
? Living in a smart home (and other fields ...)
The Rules of the Game
Potential authors must provide an extended abstract (max. 1500 words)
by 15/06/2007. The abstract can be written in the mother tongue of the
author though an English translation of this abstract must be included
if the chosen language is not English. IRIE will publish articles in
English, French, German, Portuguese or Spanish. The author(s) of
contributions in French, Portuguese, or Spanish must nominate at least
two potential peer reviewers.
The abstracts will be selected by the guest editors. The authors will
be informed of acceptance or rejection by 15/08/2007. Deadline for the
final article (3.000 words or 20.000 characters including blanks) is
15/11/2007. All submissions will be subject of a peer
review. Therefore the acceptance of an extended abstract does not
imply the publication of the final text (12/2007) unless the article
passed the peer review.
For more information about the journal see: http://www.i-r-i-e.net
Contact
PD Dr. habil. Klaus Wiegerling (Universitt Stuttgart, Germany) and
Prof. Ph. D. David Phillips (Univer- sity of Toronto, Canada) manage
the special issue as guest editors. Please send the extended ab-
stracts by e-mail to both of them:
Prof. Dr. David Phillips, davidj.phillips at utoronto.ca
PD. Dr. habil. Klaus Wiegerling, wiegerlingklaus at aol.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ciao,
--
Andrea Glorioso || http://people.digitalpolicy.it/sama/cv/
M: +39 348 921 4379 F: +39 051 930 31 133
"Truth is a relationship between a theory and the world;
beauty is a relationship between a theory and the mind."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.winstonsmith.org/pipermail/e-privacy/attachments/20070503/2c2e5255/attachment.pgp>
More information about the E-privacy
mailing list